Having graduated from the Queensland University of Technology in 1993 after 5 years articles in North Queensland, Ben practised as a litigation lawyer from 1994 before being first called to the Bar in 1999.
Ben holds a Bachelor of Laws and a Master of Laws majoring in commercial law. He practises in all aspects of commercial litigation, with special interests and expertise in the resolution of commercial disputes in the following sectors:
Ben provides down to earth, practical and effective advice and advocacy in collaboration with instructing solicitors and in-house counsel in all types of commercial litigation. Having practised both as a solicitor and as a barrister Ben has gained considerable practical experience in representing companies, business and individuals in mediations and in interlocutory, trial and appeal hearings in all levels of State and Federal courts.
Ben is a Fellow and Director of the Commercial Law Association of Australia (CLA), the inaugural Chairman of the Queensland Division of the CLA, committee member of the Building Dispute Practitioners Society, member of the Society of Construction Law of Australia, member of the Australian Insurance Law Association, and practices in all States and Territories. Ben is a qualified mediator, and has interests in commercial and international arbitration.
Ben’s work has been recognised in Doyle’s Guide as recommended leading counsel in construction law for 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.
Ben has presented and assisted as a judge of the moot trials for the Queensland Bar Practice course. He has presented for the QUT Legal Practice course, Queensland Law Society seminars and Legalwise seminars, chaired LexisNexis seminars and judged Griffith University evidence law moots, and regularly mentors students and junior lawyers.
2019 – Doyles Guide, Leading Construction Law Barrister, Queensland (recommended)
2020 – Doyles Guide, Leading Construction Law Barrister, Queensland (recommended)
2021 – Doyles Guide, Leading Construction Law Barrister, Queensland (recommended)
2022 – Doyles Guide, Leading Construction Law Barrister, Queensland (recommended)
NB: Whilst many cases settle through mediation or other ADR, below is an extract of some which have resulted in court proceedings.
Insolvency – Cooloola Dairies Pty Ltd v National Foods Milk Pty Ltd  1 Qd R 12 – corporations – application to set aside multiple statutory demands – Graywinter principle
Insolvency – Van Der Velde v Ng (No 3)  FCA 1563 – insolvency – voidable transactions – whether arrangements for the transfer of a property constitute transactions rendered voidable and by operation of s 588FE of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and whether the transfer of the property is rendered void by operation of s 468 of the Act
Insolvency – Mayaman Developments Pty Ltd v TQ Constructions Pty Ltd  QSC 144 – corporations – application to set aside statutory demand and the application of the “Graywinter” principle
Commercial – Brinsmead and Ors v Property Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd  QSC 223 – practice and procedure – disclosure and particulars in breach of contract case
Property – Zen Ridgeway v Adams  2 Qd R 298 – removal of caveat – where applicant is registered owner as trustee of land – where judgment awarded against applicant for liability incurred as trustee – nature of applicant’s right of indemnity out of trust assets – whether respondent creditor may be subrogated to the applicant trustee’s right of exoneration or lien
Succession – property – wills, probate and administration – jurisdiction and discretion of the court – handwritten document sought to be admitted to probate despite non-compliance with s 10 Succession Act – whether discretion under s 18 should be applied – In the Will and one Codicil of Julia Lesley Cleland, deceased  QSC 189
Construction – adjudication – wh jurisdictional error as no construction contract existed – wh merely loose form of understanding that applicant was to pay respondent – wh adjudication decision is void: Surfabear Pty Ltd v GJ Drainage & Concrete Construction Pty Ltd  QSC 308
Construction – adjudication – whether decision void for jurisdictional error – whether valid payment schedule given by email: Gisley Investments Pty Ltd v Williams & Anor  QSC 178
Construction – 57 Moss Rd Pty Ltd v T&M Buckley Pty Ltd t/a Shailer Constructions & Anor  QSC 278 – construction – practice and procedure – application for security for costs in BCIPA judicial review application
Construction – pleadings – joinder – discretionary factors – delay – MDC Developments Pty Ltd v G & M Van Der Vegt Nominees Pty Ltd  QCAT 489
Construction – Neumann Contractors Pty Ltd v Traspunt (No 5) Pty Ltd  2 Qd R 119 – construction – administrative – judicial review application on appeal re BCIPA claim affected by misleading or deceptive conduct
Construction – James Trowse Constructions Pty Ltd v ASAP Plasterers Pty Ltd and Ors  QSC 145 – construction – administrative – judicial review of BCIPA adjudication and whether principle of severance applies
Construction – Sweeney v Magnay  QCAT 648 – construction – 3 week trial in QCAT involving building dispute
Construction – VK Property Group Pty Ltd and Ors v Conias Properties Pty Ltd and Anor  QSC 54 – construction – administrative – judicial review application to set aside adjudication under BCIPA
Construction – Australian Timber & Trusses Pty Ltd v T & M Buckley Pty Ltd  QSC 110 – contracts – construction – trial of whether s.42 QBSA Act (unlicensed work) applied to a particular manufacture and supply contract
Property – Thorneton Avenue Pty Ltd v Body Corporate for the Avenue  QCAT 39 – body corporate – contracts – trial of application for remuneration review of caretaker and manager involving statutory interpretation
Insurance – Nucifora v AAI Ltd  QSC 338 – damages – measure and remoteness of damages – where plaintiff injured in motor vehicle accident – where plaintiff employed as general manager of coal mine – whether plaintiff suffered loss of earning capacity in the future despite no current loss – where loss of chance awarded – where claim for paid services in the future.
Appeal – Evidence – Without Prejudice negotiations – admissibility – ambit of mediated agreement – whether included a third party claim between the parties: Coomber v Meiklejohn  QDC 95
Construction – Wright v QBSA (now QBCC)  QCAT 16 – construction – licensing – review of QBSA decision relating to “excluded person” status, and “permitted individual” status and applying “Dinsey” test
Construction – John Urquhart t/as Hart Renovations v Partington & Anor  QCA 87 – contracts – building, engineering and related contracts – regulation for payment for “enclosed stage” – whether enclosed stage reached – where the applicant performed domestic building work on the residence of the respondents – where a dispute arose in connection with the respondents’ failure to pay the applicant’s progress claim – where the respondents assert the works had not reached the enclosed stage and there were defects – where in first instance the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Member concluded the enclosed stage had been reached and the respondents’ failure to pay the progress claim put them in substantial breach of the contract – where the Appeal Tribunal of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal concluded the Member had erred in finding the enclosed stage had been reached – whether the Appeal Tribunal erred in its interpretation of “structural flooring” and its conclusion on the topic of whether the enclosed stage of the building works had been reached – Held: appeal successful.
Commercial – Wiggins Island Coal Export Terminal Pty Ltd v Monadelphous Engineering Pty Ltd & Anor trading as Monadelphous Muhibbah Marine (2016) QSC 096 estoppel – issue estoppel – Anshun estoppel – BCIPA – commercial list hearing involving multiple issues in a BCIPA payment claim and adjudication application with over AUD $35M in dispute, including novel claims of issue estoppel, abuse of process and Anshun estoppel in the BCIPA adjudication process
Corporations – winding up in insolvency – statutory demand – application to set aside demand – offsetting claim – wh genuine dispute exists: Building Solutions and Waterproofing Pty Ltd v Robin H Wright Pty Ltd  QSC 110
Contract – property – breach of contract – specific performance and damages – Long & Anor v Hijazi  QDC 187
Commercial – Global Scrap Trading Pty Ltd v Graveson  QCA 080 Gotterson JA 2 May 2017 – refusal of stay of consent orders pending appeal
Insurance – McGrory v Medina Property Services Pty Limited  QCA 234 – workplace health and safety – damages – loss of earning capacity – appeal from District Court
Mortgages – Equity – Undue influence and economic duress – Suncorp-Metway Ltd v Nagatsuma & Anor  QSC 16
Construction – adjudication decisions – jurisdictional error – where two different projects involve identical parties, whether claim for payment under multiple contracts – whether terms of contract incorporated, varied or waived: S.H.A. Premier Constructions Pty Ltd v Lanskey Constructions & Ors  QSC 81
Contracts – formation of contract – contract implied from conduct – where identity of loan recipient is contested – where terms of repayment of the principal loan and interest are contested – where no direct evidence of any oral contract – wh summary judgment available: Walsh & Anor v Iker & Ors  QDC 225
Commercial – Construction – Lanskey v SHA Premier Constructions Pty Ltd  QSC (unreported, Dalton J, 28 June 2019) – successfully defended interlocutory injunction and stay application seeking to restrain enforcement of adjudication decision judgment for $1.4 million on basis of alleged jurisdictional error.
Equity – Joint venture Agreement for property development – Fiduciary Duty and Obligations – Scope Generally – interpretation – express exclusion of Fiduciary Relationship – wh no fiduciary duty proscribing conduct arose in the circumstances: Eaton v Rare Nominees Pty Limited  QCA 190
Construction – adjudication – where appellant served multiple volumes of adjudication application, with a document containing all substantive information required by QBCC “approved form”, but failed to serve actual “approved form” until 12 business days, when respondent notified appellant of the form being missing – where respondent alleged service had not been effected under the Building and Construction Industry Payments Act 2004, as had not been served “as soon as possible”, even though no date for service expressed in Act – wh “as soon as possible” should be implied in Act by s 38(4) Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld) – wh adjudicator’s jurisdiction not enlivened until proper service of application – wh jurisdiction denied where service late and not “as soon as possible”: Niclin Constructions Pty Ltd v SHA Premier Constructions Pty Ltd & Anor  QCA 177
Real Property – indefeasibility – presumed lane in Brisbane CBD – for this proceeding the lane was presumed to be a public road arising from subdivision in 1876 by Grammar School Trustees – Torrens Title – indefeasibility of title to lot owner registered under Land Title Act 1994 (Qld) – whether title of registered owner subject to historical public rights over (presumed) road: Orb Holdings Pty Ltd v WCL (Qld) Albert Steet Pty Ltd  QSC 265; overturned on appeal:  QCA 198; Special leave application to the High Court refused.
Administrative Law – construction – review of QBCC decision under Home Warranty Insurance Scheme – wh works defective – wh QBCC should indemnify applicant – wh extension of time to make insurance claim should be granted: Mark Richard Formosa v Queensland Building and Construction Commission  QCAT 93
Contracts – Building, Engineering and Related Contracts – Remuneration – wh works in the form of installation of waste tank in proposed residential lot as part of sewage system was “building work” – wh license required – wh adjudication decision under Building and Construction Industry Payments Act 2004 was void – Waterford PPG Pty Ltd v Civil Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd  QSC 8
Construction – adjudication – whether adjudication decision is void for jurisdictional error by reason that the applicant took an inconsistent position to a case pleaded in the Supreme Court – whether application vexatious – whether adjudicator misconceived his functions for determining an entitlement to retention moneys as a component of a final payment claim – where adjudicator failed to value certain defect rectification offsetting claims, despite recognizing he was required to value them – whether such an error was jurisdictional error or accidental or erroneous omission: SHA Premier Constructions Pty Ltd v Niclin Constructions Pty Ltd  QSC 307
Commercial – contracts – expert determination – interpretation and other matters – sale and purchase of coal mine in Queensland – completion accounts requiring expert determination – whether determination void for manifest error or failing to undertake task instructed to perform – Middlemount South Pty Ltd v Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Assets Pty Ltd & Anor  QSC 211; overturned in part on appeal:  QCA 132
Contracts – misleading or deceptive conduct – interpretation of contracts: Beachmount Pty Ltd v Iker Partnership & Anor  QSC 379
Commercial – guarantee and indemnity – rights of surety – rights of subrogation – whether debt written off is payment in full enlivening right of subrogation – specialty debts – previous Deed of Release and Discharge – limitation of actions on contracts, quasi-contracts and torts – principles of construction of Deed – Six summary judgment applications in trial list – Removal of Caveat – Smits v Cugola & Ors  QSC 164
Costs – Indemnity costs – Calderbank offer – Smits v Cugola & Ors  QSC 161
Guarantee and indemnity – rights of surety – rights of subrogation – whether subject to payment of whole debt – equitable defences – limitation of actions – deed of release – Smits v Cugola (2021) 8 QR 175, 10 Jun 2021Procedure – Civil Proceedings in State and Territory Courts
Contracts – Construction of Commercial Contract Terms – Where the plaintiff claims for sum due under an informal contract to drill a water bore – Where the plaintiffs gave no warranty that an aquifer would be intersected – Where no aquifer was tapped – Where the defendants contend that the plaintiff failed to perform the contract by not drilling to a true vertical depth of approximately 1,200 metres – Whether the plaintiff undertook the drilling work with reasonable care and skill – Whether the contract was an entire contract – Whether the parties agreed to end the drilling works or the plaintiff abandoned the works.
Evidence– Admissibility– Ecpert Opinion Evidence– Whether the witness is an expert in a field of specialised knowledge – Where the witness lacked expertise to give expert opinion evidence on the subject matter of the issues at trial. Drill Engineering & Pastoral Company Pty Ltd v Seymour  QDC 136 | District Court of Queensland Caselaw (queenslandjudgments.com.au) –